No practical purpose, we mean. The mouse doesn’t look at all ergonomic – ever tried to use a bar of chocolate as a mouse? We suppose a Snickers or Mars bar would operate better as a wireless remote control, but something flatter and larger definitely does not bode well for your hands even whether you’re Andre the Giant. The Chocolate mouse retails for a whopping $33, but at least that one won’t give you a cavity once you’re done with it.

Permalink: Chocolate mouse serves no purpose from Ubergizmo | Hot: Wii, PS3 and Natal Motion Sensing

[Source] dhiram